Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01718
Original file (PD2012 01718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD1201718
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20130627
Date of SEPARATION: 20031128


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SrA/E-4 (3E/Pavement & Construction Equipment) medically separated for a right ankle condition. In May 2002, he injured the lateral collateral ligaments of his right ankle. He underwent reconstructive surgery, but he did not adequately improve to fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right ankle condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB found the right ankle condition unfitting, and rated it 10%, IAW the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I feel that I am 80% disabled now and I hurt just as much as when I discharged plus they A-96 my job and had to leave my base too soon.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right ankle condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Air Force PEB – dated 20030915
 VA – (1.5 mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Ankle Pain 5272 10% Right Ankle, Residuals of Surgery 5271 10% 20040114
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 2 20040114
Rating: 10%
 Rating: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40607 ( most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed by the CI regarding the impairment with which his ankle condition continues to burden him, and the significant impact it has had on his quality of life. It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for future severity or potential complications of conditions. That role and authority is granted to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The Board evaluates DVA evidence in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. The DVA, however, is empowered to periodically re-evaluate conditions for the purpose of adjusting the CI’s disability rating should the degree of impairment change over time.
Right Ankle Pain. The CI injured his right ankle in May 2002. He underwent surgery to reconstruct the lateral collateral ligaments of the right ankle. He also received steroid injections and physical therapy. However, in spite of treatment, the ankle problem persisted and a MEB was initiated. On 22 July 2003, physical examination of the right ankle revealed slight swelling. There was pain with inversion but otherwise, range-of-motion (ROM) was preserved. A month later, the CI’s ankle was examined by podiatry. There was some tenderness, but no significant edema or effusion present. Plantar flexion was diminished, and gait was antalgic. As noted above, the CI was medically separated from in November 2003, due to the right ankle problem. Six weeks after separation, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. This exam was considered most probative. There was slight tenderness of the right ankle, but no swelling or disability. ROM was from 10 degrees to 45 degrees. The examiner’s assessment was “residuals of surgery with decreased range of motion.” The ROM evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation are summarized in the chart below.

“
Right Ankle ROM Podiatry ~ 3 mos. Pre-Sep
(20030820)
 C&P ~ 1½ mos. Post-Sep
(20040114)
Dorsiflexion (20⁰ is normal) (Not listed) 10⁰
Plantar Flexion (45⁰ is normal)Diminished” 45⁰
Comments Some tenderness, but no significant edema Slightly tender, no swelling, no disability
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available and directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the right ankle condition, but both assigned a rating of 10%. The PEB used VASRD code 5272 (ankylosis of subastragalar or tarsal joint). The VA chose diagnostic code 5271 (limited motion of ankle). The Board determined that the most appropriate code for the CI’s right ankle condition was 5271, since there was some limitation of ROM. Based on the evidence in the treatment record, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board determined that the CI’s ankle surgery had left his right ankle in good weight-bearing position. With regard to ankle ROM, he had slight-to-moderate limitation of motion. The record did not show sufficient evidence to characterize his limited ankle motion as “marked.”

After due deliberation, the Board determined that a separation disability rating of 10% for the right ankle was warranted. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other codes which could be applied to the ankle condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, since the record did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling ankle abnormality which would justify a rating higher than 10%. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right ankle condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right ankle condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic right ankle pain, status post ankle surgery 5272 10%
RATING 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120726, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review





SAF/MRB
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762


Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX :

          Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2012-01718.
         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.
         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.
                                                               Sincerely,





 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02413

    Original file (PD-2013-02413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Ankle Decrease ROM and Chronic Pain527110%S/P Surgery, R Ankle with Deg Changes and Post-op Residuals527120%20071119Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 5 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02659

    Original file (PD-2013-02659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was placed on limited duty twice and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The rating for the unfitting ankle condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00066

    Original file (PD2013 00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB found the bilateral ankle condition unfitting, and rated each ankle10% for a combined disability rating of 20%, with likely application of the VeteransAffairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).Three other conditions (listed in the rating comparison chart below) were adjudicated as Category III (not separately unfitting, and not contributing to the unfitting condition).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. The VA...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02823

    Original file (PD-2013-02823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Ankle Pain…527120%Post-Operative Residuals of Right Ankle Fracture with Degenerative Joint Disease5010-527120%20061118Other x 0 Other x 3 RATING: 20%RATING: 50% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20061221(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). NOTE: VASRD dated 20070828 noted the VA rated the CI’s ankle scar at 10% coded 7804, based on the 20061118 exam. The Board considered that there was not a preponderance...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01544

    Original file (PD-2013-01544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Ankle Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the right ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00705

    Original file (PD2011-00705.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral ankle condition as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% (pre-existing condition) respectively; IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E and the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Therefore, based on all evidence and associated conclusions just elaborated, the Board is assigning preponderant probative value to the MEB evaluation which demonstrated no loss of ROM on the left, limitation of dorsiflexion on the right, persistent subjective mild pain on the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01148

    Original file (PD2012 01148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The orthopedic evaluations on 18 November 2002 and 12 December 2002 recommended MEB, stating the ankle instabilityhad persisted despite repeated surgery, and that he had “worsening ankle pain due to physical activity,” and was unable to run, hike, march, or to perform his required duties.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination dated 21 March 2003 recorded “bilateral ankle with tenderness to palpation along lateral and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02698

    Original file (PD-2013-02698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left knee pain due to degenerative joint disease [DJD]” and “right ankle pain due to degenerative joint disease”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, citing application of the DODI and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain due to DJD5009-500310%Left Knee Residuals, S/P ACL … 5003-526010%20090831Right Ankle Pain due to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00292

    Original file (PD2011-00292.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Ankle Pain Condition . At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation obtained three months before separation, the CI reported chronic pain in both ankles, right greater than left with pain progressing from 1/10 to 5/10 with activity throughout the day. In the matter of the bilateral ankle pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends that the right and left ankle conditions each be separately adjudicated.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00835

    Original file (PD2012 00835.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB combined the two MEB conditions and adjudicated chronic pain, right ankle and low back, rated as minimal/frequent, as unfitting, rated 0%,with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and theUS Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated witha 0% disability rating. The VA rated chronic lower back pain...